Asurudu telugu book pdf download
Besides writing, Anand enjoys oil painting, reading, and drawing cartoons. Share this: Twitter Facebook. Like this: Like Loading Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:. Email required Address never made public. Name required. Follow Following. Many myths can be twisted as we like,but Ramayana is not a myth. It is a scripted epic which has too many myths surrounding. Even considering, the epic to be just a fiction and not a real happening , still we don't have the right to twist the tale as we please.
If the author had a fair eye to understand the script of Valmiki as it is, and then made the story with Ravana's perspective-it would have been the truly Asura story. With that kind of expectation, I picked the book, but was disappointed.
I don't think talking from Ravana's perspective is wrong, but twisting the facts as we would like to hear so there are some anti-brahmin , anti-ramayana arguments is not acceptable. Such a capable author could have more moral responsibility of researching more before taking his story to the world. But this inspires me to understand slokas of Ramayana in more detail before judging more about the book.
Nevertheless, the language and story telling is truly enjoyable. View all 5 comments. Jul 12, Abha Grover rated it did not like it Shelves: waste-of-time. I don't want to read this book beyond first few pages Jul 13, Ravi Gupta rated it did not like it Shelves: not-worth.
The books becomes depressing and confusing just after the very first chapter. Avoid it. It is Ramayan of Ravan with propaganda. Jul 13, Naman Singh rated it did not like it Shelves: avoid-these-books. I would certainly say all the sensible readers to avoid this book which is already deconstructionist in a devastating way! Avoid it! Dec 19, Subramanyam K.
Before proceeding any further with review let me tell the reader that Ramayana has always been an inspiration for me and I indeed worship and look up to Lord Shri Ram and his ayana ayana means moving, we can say walking in one sense, so Ramasya ayana is Ramayana.
ShrimadRamayana for all of us. Having read the blurb and my inclination towards ShrimadRamayana it is up to you to read further or leave it here. After reading the blurb I honestly felt that this book is going to give us a different Before proceeding any further with review let me tell the reader that Ramayana has always been an inspiration for me and I indeed worship and look up to Lord Shri Ram and his ayana ayana means moving, we can say walking in one sense, so Ramasya ayana is Ramayana.
After reading the blurb I honestly felt that this book is going to give us a different perspective of Ravana and we could see the things as visualized by him. However, after reading the first few pages I started searching for appendix and references if there were any, for the start of the book itself was completely different from the Ramayana I read.
Ravana and Bhadra narrate the story in the book and they speak about themselves and the way they see the world. Ravana speaks for himself while and his actions while Bhadra is the guy who loathes Ravana, Devas ,Rama ,Brahmins etc.
While there is enough rant against Lord Rama, Ravana is also vilified quite a bit. In his no holes barred attack, the author vilifies Lakshmana, Vibhishana, Hanuman….. Then the potshots on Dharma, vedic rituals and Brahmins are also there. Well if he comes up with the depictions in mythology and argued on the basis of things presented there , it would have been good.
Hurling baseless accusations is not correct from any standpoint. I think the author subscribes to the Aryan-Dravidian conflict theory , which was a very intelligent ploy of the west to divide India. Many historians have junked the theory already; however there are a few who still subscribe to the idea and create further divisions in the already divided lot of the nation. Coming back to the book, the author brings this theory up in a different way where he says that devas on horsebacks came and destroyed what was supposed to be a grand Asura empire that was widely spread all over India.
Then the book also has a very strong anti-brahmin rant. I was feeling disgusted after a certain point of time and was wondering like…. Anything that comes from north and has got to do with Brahmins is scorned at. The author has taken a lot of liberties in churning out his ideologies, eulogizing Hiranyaksha and Hiranyakashipa, calling Prahlada a weak king, then making Ravan a pupil of Mahabali, calling Sita ma as the daughter of Ravana.
My goodness, any one with any knowledge on mythology would desist this extremely outlandish stuff. One need not go to the extremes to prove a point. The author is gifted with great capabilities of writing good fiction. His description of the emotions in the early parts of the book was nice. He gives vivid descriptions of the scenes and tries to recreate the scene as much as possible and helps the reader visualize it.
However, I believe that this is not the good way of using the rare talent God has bestowed on him. Blaming both Rama and Ravana and then showing that Ravana was slightly better than Rama as Rama was too adherent to the brahminical laws might be good placate the egos of the Hindu-haters, however, I donot know if this would do any good to the society.
Ramayana gives us a message that even if one has a Golden City like Lanka, one is bound to perish if he misbehaves with a woman. In this book I find a total distortion of facts and a blatant attempt at vilifying everything that was considered good by generations and generations of Hindus. Well its fictitious stuff as per the author himself, so what can we say. Of late, vilifying Sri Rama and showing hindu faith in poor light is a fad in this nation, some feminists did it, some communists did it, some people who call themselves the protectors of the oppressed sections of the society did it in fact some of them do it even now and now this book also does it.
However, Lord Sri Rama still continues to inspire millions and millions of people all over the world. To conclude, I did not find much but vilification of people in the book.
Then a lot of lies and misguided zeal to prove a point. I am totally disappointed. For, Lord Sri Rama lived His life on this earth and He does not need a character certificate from people like us.
It is upto us, if we can learn a thing or two from His life, it will help us. If not, we are all free to choose our own paths.
Jul 11, Rudra Kapalin rated it it was amazing Recommends it for: Everyone. An amazing stories that shows Anand Neelakantan's genius. Its not just about the book but the way he looked at History, Religion, Mythology and then uses his own mind to write an awesome piece of Fiction. The thing I admire about the author is that in this country infested by religions, he thinks rationally and pours out his heart which breaths life into his Novel.
This novel by Anand makes more sense to me than Ramayana. View 2 comments. Jul 24, Vinod Manas rated it did not like it.
The author has mostly seemed a person on bewildering weed who is not sure of what he is writing. He has contradicted his own claims on many occasions in this novel. Absurd to the core! View 1 comment. Oct 11, Vibha Jain rated it liked it. Rating of this book after testing on five backgrounds. The Content. The Narration. Editing Analysis. Hard work or home work. But author did his job stupendously. Overall book. Vibha Bothra Jain Jul 19, Gaurav Sharma rated it did not like it.
I don't recommend this piece to anyone. This is depressing and poorly written. Without logic. Jul 20, Deepak Chaudhari rated it did not like it. This is a book which is written with lopsided mentality and it might not make any sense to the readers of fiction who have even a basic understanding of decent fiction.
Sep 21, SivaAnanth Muthuveeranan rated it really liked it. Quite a book, enjoyed reading every line. I was thrilled from the first page to the last one, although knew the storyline. Ravan and his servant Bhadra's version of the epic kicks our imagination to view from the loser's side. Till date we have heard only the victor's side.
History is written by those who have hanged heroes. The experience of reading Ravan's version is enthralling. Loser and the victor has a story a tell and this is the loser's tale. When Ravan gets betrayed by his own bro Hmmm When Ravan gets betrayed by his own brother, minister and navy admiral.
I could not resist my mind thinking about Gadaffi and Saddam. Ravan calls Hanuman the terrorist, who killed the asura babies and women showing no sympathy. The thought of even calling Hanuman-The terrorist never even crossed my mind so far.
Ravan has a point though. Ravan cries foul when Rama, Lakshmana and Vanara troops does not conduct war according to the code of conduct. But swiftly reacts with a statement, what to expect from Deva barbarians.
Again Ravan has a point. Reason behind abducting Sita - I would leave it to the readers to find out. He does not call himself as god or being pure, as the Lord Rama did. But the infighting of his ten faces of emotions blended with the incidents sometimes makes me feel that every one has to pass through this. One word Jul 29, Nitish Sharma rated it did not like it Shelves: agenda-driven-baseless-book. This is again a non-sense that I read and continued reading with hope of something valid and logical.
But the author has just vented out his own disgust and nothing substantial has been presented in the novel. May 15, Abhishek Ranjan rated it did not like it. What a ridiculous novel! I am ashamed that I picked it up with high hopes. This is plainly devilish and absurd. Don't read it. Mar 16, Sujata rated it it was amazing. Never having been a "fan" of Ram, when a friend's hubby told me about Asura, I immediately downloaded it on my Kindle wanting to read it after the current one I was reading.
I expected a fairly good novel — the Ramayana retold it in the words and from the perspective of Ravan. What I didn't expect was a story that completely took me over and in its entirety — with its rage and rawness and all emotions… It starts with Ravan lying on the battle fields — his life slowly oozing away — his blood drenc Never having been a "fan" of Ram, when a friend's hubby told me about Asura, I immediately downloaded it on my Kindle wanting to read it after the current one I was reading.
What I didn't expect was a story that completely took me over and in its entirety — with its rage and rawness and all emotions… It starts with Ravan lying on the battle fields — his life slowly oozing away — his blood drenching the grounds he lies on. Telugu Jathakam. Chandi Homam Telugu Vedic Astrologer. Internet Archive Search Telugu Books. And this whole miracle happened after i contacted Dr tunde for help, I am the happiest woman today in this whole wide world.
Pdf drive is your search engine for pdf files. The average donation is The Astrological Emagazine Books institute of financial astrology.
Bagikan Artikel ini. Unknown 24 Juli Tambahkan komentar. Muat yang lain But once it reached the known territory of second half, i felt the desire of skipping. The spice of the story have been the character of Bhadra, really nice and comical one.
But there is another aspect of story as well and that is what i pronounce as the soul of entire work. This soul is nothing else than the theme and motive of the story and it is not logical one and are based on stupid reasoning.
Following are my reasons for saying so:1 During Vedic period i. This is highly fabricated theory. Indra has been praised for his warriors trait throughout Veda.
Its true that he destroyed Asura empire ,but it doesn't give liberty to paint him as a rapist. It is absurd and nonsense. Although jokingly, but it draws very clear intention of Asura clan to de-mine the Devas. To my dismay , i dont understand whether soorpanakha, an ugly looking Asura was a Miss world or Miss India. Can these ugly looking Asuras clan be raped?
0コメント